Time Travel

This season of LOST has got me thinking a lot about time travel. I agree in principal with the way they handle their time travel, namely that when you are back in time you cannot change anything.

So I was prepared to write a large post about my theories on time travel, and then I discovered that it was already completely covered on BaconBach, almost word for word what I was going to write. I guess that means that when I search my own blog to see if I have already talked about something, I better start searching his blog too.

Anyway, you can check that link out to read about it there, or you can read my summarization here (EDIT: I think this ended up being longer than the original, so perhaps summarization isn’t the best word).

If you go back in time, I don’t think you can change anything because anything you would have done back then would have left evidence for us to find in the future. For example, you can’t kill Hitler before WWII because here in the present we all know about Hitler and WWII and they happened. If you had killed Hitler, then we would live in a world that never knew about any of that stuff. So obviously, you didn’t.

Let me give you another example. Right now, as we sit here, we don’t know anything about time travel. But lets say in the future someone invents time travel and goes back in time and leaves a novel there, say a “lost work” of Shakespeare, so that in the future generations of people grow up believing that novel is a work of Shakespeare (thank you Chrononaughts for the plot line). So here in the present day, we have all grown up with this book. We’re taught it in class, we’ve seen the movie version, countless other works have been based off of that book, basically the entire landscape of pop culture has been affected and all of our thinking is suspect.

“But”, you say, “so what? At the moment he placed the book, all of the future that did not contain this book was wiped out and a new one was created in which the book existed.” Okay, that’s possible. But if that were true, then time would probably need to be redone every time any time traveler went back to the past, based on changes they did or did not mean to make. And I’m assuming that if we had a time machine, there would be lots and lots of trips to the past. So whatever mechanism governs the deleting and re-making of time would be constantly doing nothing else than changing our lives. It’s CPU would be pegged out at 100% so to speak. And I just can’t imagine a world whose governing laws would allow for the constant erasing and re-doing of every detail of everything.

There is the possibility that going back and changing something spins off an alternate reality in which that event did or did not occur.  I’m not saying that’s not true, and this doesn’t preclude that. I’m just saying I don’t care because A) if there are alternate realities then I think all possibilities already exist (so you are not creating a new one) and B) who cares what happens to those evil me’s that exist in those alternate realities, I only care about what happens to this one!

5 thoughts on “Time Travel

  1. It’s funny that time travel discussion always involve killing Hitler. I just read a good article on this lately.

    http://io9.com/5094494/why-you-cant-travel-back-in-time-and-kill-hitler

    My favorite is how awesome Hitler’s bodyguards are at thwarting time-traveling assassins. I’m move a believer of the “Back to the Future” theory of time travel rather than the “Bill and Ted” version. So go ahead and make all the alternate realities that you want, just so long as you do it at 88 miles per hour.

    Like

  2. I particularly like the Kennedy assassination episode of Quantum Leap to explain time travel. In this episode, it is revealed that Jackie O. was shot along with President Kennedy. Sam’s leap prevented her from being killed. It’s hard to explain, but doing this altered history without anyone realizing it.

    By the way, great topics lately Shane! You’ve given me much to think about!

    Like

  3. You should read The Time Traveler’s Wife. It has a very different perspective on time travel from most other things I’ve seen/read. Its model is very fatalistic, arguing that there’s one timeline, and any “changes” made when traveling to the past actually contribute to the present that we already know. Naturally, this can be depressing for the time traveler who knows that no matter what he tries, he can’t alter the future.

    But I’ve always like the Bill & Ted model, where they can change the present whenever they want, as long as they remember to go back in time later and make the change they wanted.

    As an aside, I’ve got to watch Quantum Leap. We loved Journeyman and were very sorry to see it canceled.

    Like

    • I have read Time Traveler’s Wife, and I heartily approve both the book and their concept of time travel! 🙂

      As for Quantum Leap, a couple of years ago Sara tivoed them off of (I think) sci-fi channel and managed to see like every one again.

      Saaaaam! Ziggy says this show will run in syndication forever!

      Like

      • I can’t believe I didn’t think of the Time Traveler’s Wife; it’s only one of my most favorite books! I always describe it as one of the most realistic time travel stories!

        Like

Leave a comment